Trump ‘riding a unicorn over a rainbow’, says ex-spokesman Spicer

Mr Spicer visited polish total of Mr Trump and a First Lady during Madame Tussauds in New York final AprilImage copyright

Image caption

Mr Spicer visited polish total of Mr Trump and a First Lady during Madame Tussauds in New York final April

Ex-Trump orator Sean Spicer has described his former trainer as “a unicorn, roving a unicorn over a rainbow” in his stirring memoir.

The initial orator of a Trump White House writes glowingly of a boss though also contradicts his comment of former debate authority Paul Manafort.

“I don’t consider we will ever again see a claimant like Donald Trump,” he says.

The Briefing: Politics, a Press and a President is due to be expelled 24 Jul and has been praised by Mr Trump.

“His high-wire act is one that few could ever follow,” Mr Spicer writes, according to preview excerpts performed by a Guardian.

“He is a unicorn, roving a unicorn over a rainbow… His ability to focus from a clearly career-ending impulse to a mad attack on his opponents is a talent few politicians can muster.”

Image copyright

The book contradicts Mr Spicer’s prior comments about Mr Manafort, who quiescent in Aug 2016 amid allegations he had not announced payments imagining in former Soviet countries where he had worked as a domestic lobbyist.

Mr Manafort was jailed final month and is charged with income laundering, taxation fraud, unwell to register as a unfamiliar agent, and deterrent of justice.

Mr Spicer had pronounced during a White House press discussion that Mr Manafort “played a really singular purpose for a really singular volume of time”, echoing Mr Trump’s explain that his former debate authority had usually been with a debate “for a brief duration of time”.

  • Sparks fly in FBI agent’s Trump testimony
  • Manafort: Trump’s former debate chair

“Paul brought a much-needed majority to a Trump campaign,” Mr Spicer says, adding that before he assimilated “there was no emergence of a debate structure, only a few, distraught, busy people constantly barking into their phones.”

“Paul immediately set adult and staffed a domestic and communications operations required to take on a Clinton machine.”

Mr Spicer also writes that a US Department of Homeland Security met with a debate in Oct 2016 to assure them “that there was no approach to penetrate or manipulate a outcome of a inhabitant election”, according to a Daily Mail.

However, US comprehension has resolved that Russian hackers targeted Democratic email servers, and committed other cyber-attacks in an bid to assist Mr Trump’s campaign.

“Seeming to trust that Clinton would win, they implored us to publicly demonstrate certainty in a firmness of a voting process, system, and outcome,” writes Mr Spicer.