US presidential claimant Donald Trump has called for a protest of Apple until a tech hulk helps clear a iPhone of one of a San Bernardino killers.
Apple has clashed with a Justice Department (DoJ) over a justice sequence forcing a association to assistance mangle a encryption on one of a phones.
On Friday a DoJ called Apple’s refusal a “marketing strategy”.
Apple pronounced it will not assistance mangle into a a phone, citing wider remoteness concerns for a users.
The phone belonged to one of a dual people who non-stop glow during an bureau eventuality in San Bernardino, California, final December, murdering 14
Speaking during a debate rally, Mr Trump said: “Boycott Apple until such time as they give that information.”
On Thursday, a justice systematic a tech hulk to assistance mangle a encryption.
The supervision has called a ask slight and argued it is usually focused on this sold iPhone.
The DoJ filed another suit in justice on Friday after Apple’s arch executive, Tim Cook, pronounced Apple would continue to exclude a order.
A California justice has set 22 Mar for a hearing.
Analysis: Dave Lee, BBC North America record reporter
Before this goes to court, it’s being played out with a fight of words.
The DoJ suit currently is about investigators outstanding a round behind into Tim Cook’s court. It disputes his explain that a confidence of a products would be inherently and perpetually compromised.
It radically argues that Mr Cook’s position – and indeed a position of a other record companies that support him – is encouraged by business, not ethics.
Apple has been given an prolongation to contention a grave response, though a genuine sparks are expected to fly during a conference date set for late March.
It will take place in San Bernardino under, you’d imagine, a inspection of a families held adult in a tragedy.
In a letter to customers published on Apple’s website, Mr Cook called a implications of a sequence “chilling”.
“While we trust a FBI’s intentions are good, it would be wrong for a supervision to force us to build a backdoor into a products. And ultimately, we fear that this direct would criticise a really freedoms and autocracy a supervision is meant to protect.”