Australian Open 2017: Roger Federer adopts nothing-to-lose mindset v Rafael Nadal

Roger Federer and Rafael Nadal

Rafael Nadal kick Roger Federer in a Australian Open in 2009 to take a title

Roger Federer says he will not let his long-standing adversary with Rafael Nadal impact his opening in a Australian Open final on Sunday.

The 35-year-old Swiss has met Nadal, 30, in 8 Grand Slam finals, many recently during a French Open in 2011.

Federer, attempting to secure his 18th Grand Slam title, has not beaten 14-time vital leader Nadal in a final of a Slam given Wimbledon in 2007.

“I’ve got to have a arrange of a nothing-to-lose mentality,” pronounced Federer.

“I know this justice allows me to play a certain diversion opposite Rafa that we can't do on centre justice during a French Open.”

  • Live scores, formula and sequence of play
  • Serena beats Venus to win record 23rd Grand Slam
  • BBC coverage of a Australian Open

Spain’s Nadal has won 6 of a duo’s Grand Slam final meetings, including violence Federer in 5 sets to win a Australian Open in 2009.

The dual will accommodate on justice for a 35th time in Melbourne from 08:30 GMT.

“He’s an implausible tennis player,” pronounced Federer, who described himself as Nadal’s series one. “He’s got shots that no other one has. When we have that, we are singular and special.”

Should Nadal win on Sunday, he will be a initial male in a Open epoch – and third altogether – to win all 4 Grand Slam titles twice. Federer, meanwhile, is perplexing to turn a initial male to win 3 of a vital titles 5 times.

“It’s sparkling for both of us that we are still there and fighting for critical events,” pronounced Nadal. “It’s really special.”


Rafael Nadal and Roger Federer will accommodate on justice for a 35th time

‘I didn’t consider about being where we am now’

The adversary began during a Miami Masters in 2004, when a 17-year-old Nadal kick Federer, afterwards a universe series one, 6-3 6-3.

Nadal has won 23 of their 34 meetings, though Federer triumphed in their final – in Basel in 2015.

Three of their Grand Slam finals have left to 5 sets, as did both of their semi-finals progressing this week.

Nadal took 4 hours 56 mins to kick Grigor Dimitrov on Friday, a day after Federer was taken to 5 sets by compatriot Stan Wawrinka.

Both players had injury-affected seasons in 2016, with Federer sidelined for 6 months with a knee problem, and a wrist damage forcing Nadal to repel from a French Open.

“When we have to go from Roland Garros though going on court, we remember myself good in a car. That was a tough moment,” Nadal said.

“I didn’t consider about being where we am today. It is special to play with Roger again in a final of a Grand Slam.”

Federer looks to hurl behind a years


Roger Federer is attempting to win his fifth Australian Open pretension in his initial final given 2010

Sunday’s compare will be Federer’s 100th during a Australian Open.

He is a oldest male to strech a Grand Slam final given Ken Rosewall, a US Open finalist in 1974 aged 39 years and 310 days.

And feat would make him a second oldest male to win a Grand Slam pretension in a Open epoch – Rosewall carrying won 3 vital titles after his 35th birthday.

“Rosewall wrote me a minute this week to wish me good again,” pronounced Federer. “He does it any year during a Australian Open.

“To be in a same exhale like these guys, it’s a good feeling. we adore these guys. It means a lot to me to have equalled something like this.”

Nadal v Federer – prior Grand Slam finals

2006: French Open – Nadal won 1-6 6-1 6-4 7-6 (7-4)

2006: Wimbledon – Federer won 6-0 7-6 (7-5) 6-7 (2-7) 6-3

2007: French Open – Nadal won 6-3 4-6 6-3 6-4

2007: Wimbledon – Federer won 7-6 (9-7) 4-6 7-6 (7-3) 2-6 6-2

2008: French Open – Nadal won 6-1 6-3 6-0

2008: Wimbledon – Nadal won 6-4 6-4 6-7 (5-7) 6-7 (8-10) 9-7

2009: Australian Open – Nadal won 7-5 3-6 7-6 (7-3) 3-6 6-2

2011: French Open – Nadal won 7-5 7-6 (7-3) 5-7 6-1


Russell Fuller, BBC tennis correspondent:

“When Federer flew to Mallorca to assistance launch Nadal’s academy in a autumn, knee and wrist injuries meant an muster compare was out of a question. Little did they suppose their subsequent on justice assembly would be so near, and on such an critical stage.

“The story of their matches points to a Nadal victory. But a Spaniard spent scarcely dual hours longer on justice in winning his semi-final, that was played a day after than Federer’s. The Swiss is handling an abductor injury, though afterwards again he is amatory a quicker courts that should play into his hands.

“What is transparent is that there is an huge volume during stake. If Nadal wins he will tighten to within dual Grand Slam titles of Federer’s record of 17 and turn a initial male in a Open Era to win any of a sport’s vital prizes during slightest twice.”

John Lloyd, 1977 Australian Open finalist and BBC Sport analyst:

“If Rafa had played a five-hour compare a day after Roger when Rafa was during his rise – when he was winning majors all a time – we would not have been worried. We saw many times how he could redeem from prolonged matches.

“The disproportion now is he hasn’t been in this position for a while – that does regard me. The semi-final opposite Dimitrov was exhausting, not only physically though mentally. we consider that does give a small advantage to Federer.

“However, Rafa is such a soldier we still consider he will be alright – and we collect him to win.”