Theresa May warns tech firms over apprehension content

Theresa MayImage copyright

Technology companies contingency go “further and faster” in stealing nonconformist content, Theresa May has told a United Nations ubiquitous assembly.

The primary apportion will also horde a open with other universe leaders and Facebook, Microsoft and Twitter.

She will plea amicable networks and hunt engines to find fixes to take down militant element in dual hours.

Tech hulk Google pronounced firms were doing their partial though could not do it alone – governments and users indispensable to help.

The primary apportion has regularly called for an finish to a “safe spaces” she says terrorists suffer online.

Ministers have called for boundary to end-to-end encryption, that stops messages being examination by third parties if they are intercepted, and measures to quell a widespread of element on amicable media.

  • What can tech firms do to quarrel terror?
  • UK ‘biggest audience’ in Europe for jihadist web content
  • Google launches UK ‘anti-terror fund’
  • Cellan-Jones: Politicians v tech tycoons
  • Islamic State’s amicable media resilience

At a ubiquitous assembly, a primary apportion hailed swell done by tech companies given a investiture in Jun of an attention forum to opposite terrorism.

But she urged them to go “further and faster” in building synthetic comprehension solutions to automatically revoke a duration in that apprehension promotion stays available, and eventually forestall it appearing during all.

Media captionGoogle’s ubiquitous warn Kent Walker shielded a anti-terrorism efforts on BBC Radio 4’s Today

“This is a vital step in reclaiming a internet from those who would use it to do us harm,” she said.

Together, a UK, France and Italy will call for a aim of one to dual hours to take down militant calm wherever it appears.

Internet companies will be given a month to uncover they are holding a problem seriously, with ministers during a G7 open on 20 Oct due to confirm either adequate swell has been made.

Kent Walker, ubiquitous warn for Google, who is representing tech firms during Mrs May’s meeting, pronounced they would not be means to “do it alone”.

“Machine-learning has softened though we are not all a approach there yet,” he told BBC Radio 4’s Today programme, in an disdainful interview.

“We need people and we need feedback from devoted supervision sources and from a users to brand and mislay some of a many cryptic calm out there.”

Asked about carrying bomb-making instructions on sites, he said: “Whenever we can locate this material, we are stealing it.

“The plea is once it’s removed, many people re-post it or there are copies of it opposite a web.

“And so a plea of identifying it and identifying a disproportion between bomb-making instructions and things that competence demeanour identical that competence be ideally authorised – competence be documentary or systematic in inlet – is a genuine challenge.”

  • Newsround Guide: What is a United Nations?

A Downing Street source said: “These companies have some of a best smarts in a world.

“They should unequivocally be focusing on what matters, that is interlude a widespread of terrorism and violence.”

Technology companies shielded their doing of nonconformist calm after critique from ministers following a London Bridge apprehension conflict in June.

Google pronounced it had already spent hundreds of millions of pounds on rebellious a problem.

Facebook and Twitter pronounced they were operative tough to absolved their networks of militant activity and support.

YouTube told a BBC that it perceived 200,000 reports of inapt calm a day, though managed to examination 98% of them within 24 hours.

Addressing a UN General Assembly, Mrs May also pronounced terrorists would never win, though that “defiance alone is not enough”.

“Ultimately it is not only a terrorists themselves who we need to defeat. It is a nonconformist ideologies that fuel them. It is a ideologies that evangelise hatred, boar multiplication and criticise a common humanity,” she said.


A new news out on Tuesday found that online jihadist promotion attracts some-more clicks in a UK than in any other nation in Europe.

The investigate by a centre-right consider tank, Policy Exchange, suggested a UK open would support new laws criminalising reading calm that glorifies terror.

Image copyright

Image caption

IS militants are relocating to reduction obvious sites after being chased off mainstream amicable media

Google pronounced it will give £1m to account counter-terrorism projects in a UK, partial of a $5m (£3.7m) tellurian commitment.

The hunt hulk has faced critique about how it is addressing such content, quite on YouTube.

The appropriation will be handed out in partnership with UK-based counter-extremist organization a Institute for Strategic Dialogue (ISD).

An eccentric advisory house will be usurpation a initial turn of applications in November, with grants of between £2,000 and £200,000 awarded to successful proposals.

ISD arch executive Sasha Havlicek said: “We are fervent to work with a far-reaching operation of innovators on building their ideas in a entrance months.”

‘International consensus’

A orator for a Global Internet Forum to Combat Terrorism, that is shaped of tech companies, pronounced combating a widespread of nonconformist element online compulsory responses from government, polite multitude and a private sector.

“Together, we are committed to doing all in a energy to safeguard that a platforms are not used to discharge militant content,” pronounced a spokesman.

Brian Lord, a former emissary executive for Intelligence and Cyber Operations during UK comprehension monitoring use GCHQ, pronounced a UN was “probably a best place” to lift a matter as there was a need for “an general consensus” over a change between giveaway debate and tackling extremism.

He told BBC Radio 4’s Today programme: “You can use a sledgehammer to moment a bulb and so, actually, one can say: good only take a whole tie of information off a internet, since somewhere in there will be a bad things we don’t wish people to see.

“But afterwards that counters a accessibility of information,” adding that what is seen as “free speech” in one nation competence be seen as something that should be taken down in another.