There have been cases where group have been stalked and secretly accused: Farhan Akhtar weighs in on a Hrithik-Kangana controversy

farhan akhtar, hrithik roshan, kangana ranaut, farhan, hrithik kangana. kangana hrithik, hrithik, kangana, hrithik interview, hrithik roshan interview, kangana hrithik fight, hrithik kangana fightfarhan akhtar, hrithik roshan, kangana ranaut, farhan, hrithik kangana. kangana hrithik, hrithik, kangana, hrithik interview, hrithik roshan interview, kangana hrithik fight, hrithik kangana fight Farhan Akhtar took to Facebook to share his thoughts on a Hrithik-Kangana controversy.

The Hrithik-Kangana discuss is removing exhilarated adult with each flitting day. After Twinkle Khanna, Farhan Akhtar has also weighed in on a controversy. In his Facebook post, a actor-director does not name any of a dual parties endangered though it is utterly transparent that he is referring to Kangana Ranaut and Hrithik Roshan.

Farhan has voiced that there have been a few cases where organisation were stalked, tormented and secretly accused. He also says that Hrithik has been treated in an astray demeanour in this discuss and vast sections of a media have discriminated opposite him. Farhan also discusses a apparent rendezvous in Paris that stands though any explanation and also brings adult a allegedly photoshopped sketch of Hrithik and Kangana that has been circulated all over.

Farhan Akhtar destined Hrithik Roshan in his 2004 film, ‘Lakshya’. The dual also co-starred in Zoya Akhtar’s 2011 film, ‘Zindagi Na Milegi Dobara’ and in a 2009 film, ‘Luck By Chance’.

Read Farhan’s Facebook post here:

“Today we review an open minute created by a male we know about a lady we know, professionally, during best. Although a discuss about them is going around given a while now, to my best believe this is a initial time this male has voiced his indicate of view.

I am not a management on who is right or wrong in their situation, that’s for a cybercrime officials to figure out, though we do feel certain aspects of a approach a events have unfolded need comment.

Like anyone who has an iota of objectivity and clarity of fairness, we too determine that in a society, some-more mostly than not, it is a lady who suffers misapplication and repression. It is offensive though loyal that in some cases of rape, a territory of multitude has blamed a victim.

I have always found this to be unacceptable.

4 years ago, we founded MARD (Men Against Rape Discrimination) and by a initiative, we have been outspoken in my quarrel opposite gender-related assault and in highlighting cases of ambience opposite women and a LGBTI community.

Although it is loyal that in many cases it is a lady that has been wronged, there is a disproportion between ‘most’ and ‘all’.”

He serve added:

“However few and singular they might be, there have been cases where organisation have been stalked, tormented and secretly accused. This existence has been supposed by a top courts of a land.

It is in this suggestion of objectivity and integrity that currently we contingency pronounce up.

The approach this part has played out with sections of a media is worrisome.

Some of a many conjectural reporters have, consciously or unconsciously, pushed one side of a comment WITHOUT carrying or presenting any justification to behind a claims being finished by a woman. They’ve supposed her story during face value.

Isn’t this cultured opposite a other party?”

For a moment, lets put aside emotion, prejudice, biases, a understandably protecting instincts and
look during a contribution as they exist today.

She claims they had an eventuality durability 7 years and during that period, they exchanged a series of emails.

While he denies ever mailing her, he has filed an central complaint, common and submitted all required information and documents, handed over his personal phone and laptop to a endangered authorities.

The lady has not. Apparently, she has avoided, compartment date, submitting her personal communication inclination citing some reason or a other.

In some past cases, this miss of team-work has been deemed to be deterrent of justice.

Handing over her phone and mechanism is not usually a right thing to do implicitly and legally though is also a best probable approach for her to infer she’s revelation a truth. So because exclude or delay?

Apparently, he has over a thousand emails from her central email comment that are insinuate and passionate in their content. She claims not to have created them though alleges that he hacked her comment and mailed himself.

If they were in a 7 year prolonged jointly acceptable relationship, because would he need to do that? Does it not challenge logic?
Also, did he respond to any of her emails?

As distant as we know, No. Not one singular time.

Pause here and ask yourself..If a lady was to accept these arrange of emails from a male and she claimed harassment, what would your evident greeting be?

If a lady was to accept these arrange of emails from a male and she claimed harassment, what would your evident greeting be?

Would we have given a male a advantage of doubt by desiring him if he pronounced they were in a attribute and she had hacked into his mechanism and sent herself a mails..?

Chances are we wouldn’t.

There’s more.

She posted a design of them together claiming it was taken during a years of their purported affair. That design was proved, over doubt, to have been manipulated.

The tangible design consisted of a organisation of friends including a man’s mother (now ex-wife) station together in a party.

Why were a others intentionally cropped out?

She has no messages and no photographs to infer that she was in a 7 year prolonged attribute with this man. Not even a design of their purported rendezvous in Paris, an eventuality that he denies.

Furthermore, he has asserted that his pass does not bear any stamp of transport to France during a time she alleges a rendezvous occurred nor are there any convincing witnesses to this event.

Don’t all these inconsistencies lift questions in your mind about a flawlessness of a accusations?

So what is a truth?

Well, a law is that WE do not know a truth.

The reason we felt a need to contend this is that it is apparent that some people have already jumped to conclusions while some are deriving some arrange of voyeuristic pleasure by enlivening a lady to lift on speaking.

This is being finished though a seconds postponement to cruise a outcome her disproportion will have on a person, his family or his children. As good as all of it might be for TRP, it’s in terrible taste.

Until such a time that a matter is brought to a judicious end by a authorities, we contingency equivocate disparaging a male on a basement of unsubstantiated statements.

That is what we would have finished if this story had played a other approach around. That’s what we contingency do given how it is now.

Let’s not discriminate.”

Here is Farhan’s Facebook post :

Actress Sonam Kapoor retweeted Farhan’s post on Twitter with a caption, “Well created and really satisfactory Farhan. we concur.”

It seems Bollywood is now holding sides in this controversy.

For all a latest Entertainment News, download Indian Express App