The physique that regulates health and amicable caring in England admits it could have acted some-more fast after a rape was reported during a home for people with training disabilities in north London.
The rape is purported to have happened in Nov 2015 and a home sealed a year later.
An essay in a Times on Thursday indicted a Care Quality Commission of a cover-up.
The CQC says it will now examine what should have been finished differently.
The regulator pronounced it legalised a residential caring home, run by Hillgreen Care, following a purported rape of a former resident, and carried out serve inspections in Jan and Mar 2016.
At a same time, a occurrence was being investigated by a military – and this resolved in Dec 2016.
There was deficient justification for charges to be made, a Times essay reported, since a plant was not means to pronounce and his clothing, containing intensity DNA evidence, was cleared shortly afterwards.
Sir David Behan, arch executive of a CQC, said: “Whilst we did take movement that led to a closure of this and dual other services run by a Hillgreen Care Ltd, we trust that we could and should have taken movement some-more speedily, both to safeguard people were protected and in prosecuting this provider.”
As a result, he said, he was commissioning an eccentric investigation, “which will news publicly to a CQC house and brand what has happened, what we should have finished differently and that will make recommendations to strengthen a destiny work”.
Sir David added: “We design honesty and clarity from those we umpire and we will reason ourselves to criticism to those same standards.”
The CQC now has rapist powers to prosecute providers and people when people in their caring have been spoiled or placed during risk of harm.
It pronounced it was “actively pursuing” what serve movement it could now take opposite Hillgreen Care.
A CQC investigation news from Jan 2016 found that a caring home had critical issues with food safety, hygiene and cleanliness. There was also no purebred manager in position in a home.
It resolved that “people were during risk since a use did not have effective systems and government oversight”.
Hillgreen Care Ltd did not respond to a BBC’s requests for a comment, though a Times pronounced that solicitors for a association described many of a criticisms as “unfair and inaccurate”.